New from template

I just learned an effective new argumentation technique from M.C. Barsenas, and I'm itching to try it out. Here it goes:

The Church Constitution is not a democracy contrary to the pretender Catholic's deep-seated wishes living document, contrary to the feminist's wishes. It is not an equal-opportunity employer. Christ had Twelve Apostles, all of them men. The Constitutional Convention had fifty-five members, all of them men. For 2,000 years priests have been men. For 131 years women were unable to vote. Holy Scripture and Sacred Tradition The original Constitution is clear: there will be no female priests voters, not now, not tomorrow, not forever. Rome The Founding Fathers have spoken, the case is closed.

So, how convincing is that argument? I didn't ask you, Ann Coulter!