January 21, 2008
Lazyweb request
What's the fastest way to discover new bands that I will most probably like, given that I listen to They Might Be Giants, Rufus Wainwright, Rooney, and Jon Brion disproportionately?Posted by Jeffrey at 10:48 PM
Myth, myth! (Yes?)
File under "if you repeat it enough times, and have Oliver Stone film a fictional instance, people will start to believe it":...The story quotes Ted Sampley, a Green Beret in Vietnam whose web site has led the charge for some veterans against Kerry. Sampley says, "I truly believe that John Kerry's testimony before Congress [against the Vietnam War] had a big role in people who were supposedly peaceniks spitting on vets and calling them baby killers when they got home." There are two problems with Sampley's "belief" as reported by the Plain Dealer. First, guilt by association is always a weak argument, and more likely a smear tactic that is unfair to the subject. America has learned this before, during the Palmer Raids of WWI, the McCarthyism of the Cold War, and now during the Ashcroft era of the War on Terror and the Patriot Act. More important, however, is that the charge is simply not rooted in reality. It is both unfair to Senator Kerry and to the Vietnam-era peace movement. The fact is, there is absolutely no record of any peace activist taunting or spitting upon returning veterans. It is myth, and like most myths it is hard to dislodge. In 1995 sociologist Thomas Beamish and his colleagues analyzed all peace movement-related stories from 1965 - 1971 in the NY Times, LA Times, and SF Chronicle (495 stories). They found no instance of any spitting on returned troops by peace movement members, nor any taunting. Indeed, they found few examples of negative demonstrations involving returning troops of any kind, or even of simple disapproval of returning soldiers. Three years later, sociologist Jerry Lembcke conducted a similarly exhaustive study for his book, The Spitting Image, with like results. He discovered war protesters being spat upon by war supporters, and hostile acts toward Vietnam veterans by conservative, pro-war groups like the VFW, but no taunting or spitting on returned veterans by peace movement members. Returned veterans and in-service GIs were welcomed in the peace movement, and many assumed leadership roles. Yet the myth endures...
Posted by Jeffrey at 1:31 PM
January 12, 2008
We're number one! We're number one! (At death)
Paul Krugman has an interesting look at the performance of U.S. health care here. But the most insightful part is down in the comments:“so why do we feel that our health care in the U.S. is so much better than those other countries?” Because people in the USA have had it drilled into them, over and over again, that we are the best country in the world, at absolutely everything, and that we have nothing at all to learn from anyone, ever.
Posted by Jeffrey at 9:01 PM
Calm them down
I used to think Whoopi Goldberg was my favorite View-member, but now it looks like Joy Behar wins:I think I'm going to get in trouble for this, but you know what? I have a theory that you can't find any saints anymore because of psychotropic medication. I think that [in] the old days, the saints were hearing voices, and they didn't have any thorazine to calm them down. Now, that we have all of this medication available to us, you can't find a saint anymore!
Posted by Jeffrey at 12:51 PM
When we all know
You have to love these dumb-ass articles about "millennials" written by old fogeys:Young IT employees pose a challenge to many managers who say the Millennial generation holds employers up to unrealistic expectations and makes unreasonable demands for their services. Millennials -- employees between the ages of 18 and 31 -- represent the top challenge for IT managers, according to survey results released Thursday from Atlantic Associates, an IT staffing company. Atlantic Associates polled more than 100 Massachusetts executives on the challenges they face and more than 50% of respondents described those teen and 20-something employees as the "toughest generation to manage." Generation Xers (ages 32 to 42 years old) placed second with 17% of respondents saying they pose a management challenge. Jack Harrington, co-founder and principal of the staffing firm, says the problem between employers and the younger generation just entering the workforce can be traced back to the employees' upbringing or an easier way of life for children in the United States today. "The issue managers are facing is with retention, not hiring. That means the work environment is not living up to the employee's expectation," he says. For instance, many younger workers expect to get an office immediately or be paid at a rate higher than entry level. "Millennials are coming in with high expectations and are disillusioned about the reality of a work place. They feel they should be rewarded and start at the top, when we all know you have to work your way up. They have been raised to be rewarded often and when you get into the workforce those rules change a bit," Harrington says.Whoa whoa whoa... do we all actually know that you have to work your way up? Doctors and lawyers start out making a substantial sum of money... so why can't IT experts? The most illuminating section comes later:
"To reach a good working balance, Millennials will have to change their ideas somewhat, but the work environment will also change to appeal to these very in-demand employees," he says.And the truth comes out. IT experts are highly in-demand. IT experts know this, and in return demand a high salary and nice perks. Employers resent young adults making more than they did at that age, and complain about the situation to the press. This is another example of conservatives loving the labor market right up until it screws them over. (For more on fogeys insulting young adults, see here.)
Posted by Jeffrey at 10:32 AM

